REVIEW 1 cited by
Automated News Summarization Using Transformers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The amount of text data available online is increasing at a very fast pace hence text summarization has become essential. Most of the modern recommender and text classification systems require going through a huge amount of data. Manually generating precise and fluent summaries of lengthy articles is a very tiresome and time-consuming task. Hence generating automated summaries for the data and using it to train machine learning models will make these models space and time-efficient. Extractive summarization and abstractive summarization are two separate methods of generating summaries. The extractive technique identifies the relevant sentences from the original document and extracts only those from the text. Whereas in abstractive summarization techniques, the summary is generated after interpreting the original text, hence making it more complicated. In this paper, we will be presenting a comprehensive comparison of a few transformer architecture based pre-trained models for text summarization. For analysis and comparison, we have used the BBC news dataset that contains text data that can be used for summarization and human generated summaries for evaluating and comparing the summaries generated by machine learning models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Unraveling the Capabilities of Language Models in News Summarization
A 20-model benchmark on three news datasets finds GPT-3.5/GPT-4 lead, a few small models are competitive, and three-shot demonstrations with low-quality gold summaries fail to help.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.