REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Demonstrating Fault Tolerance in Small Circuits Using Bacon-Shor Codes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Quantum error correction is necessary to perform large-scale quantum computations in the presence of noise and decoherence. As a result, several aspects of quantum error correction have already been explored. These have been primarily studies of quantum memory[1, 2], an important first step towards quantum computation, where the objective is to increase the lifetime of the encoded quantum information. Additionally, several works have explored the implementation of logical gates[3-5]. In this work we study a next step - fault-tolerantly implementing quantum circuits. We choose the $[[4, 1, 2]]$ Bacon-Shor subsystem code, which has a particularly simple error-detection circuit. Through both numerics and site-counting arguments, we compute pseudo-thresholds for the Pauli error rate $p$ in a depolarizing noise model, below which the encoded circuits outperform the unencoded circuits. These pseudo-threshold values are shown to be as high as $p=3\%$ for short circuits, and $p=0.6\%$ for circuits of moderate depth. Additionally, we see that multiple rounds of stabilizer measurements give an improvement over performing a single round at the end. This provides a concrete suggestion for a small-scale fault-tolerant demonstration of a quantum algorithm that could be accessible with existing hardware.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantum communication and fault-tolerance
The thesis proves that fault-tolerant encoder and decoder circuits can achieve entanglement-assisted communication rates close to the ideal capacity, and reports trapped-ion error-detection experiments plus a new boun...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.