Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.02755 v1 pith:ML4TH67R submitted 2021-08-05 cs.LG econ.GNq-fin.EC

classification cs.LGecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords economicdesigneconomistpolicytwo-levelbehavioraldeepoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI and reinforcement learning (RL) have improved many areas, but are not yet widely adopted in economic policy design, mechanism design, or economics at large. At the same time, current economic methodology is limited by a lack of counterfactual data, simplistic behavioral models, and limited opportunities to experiment with policies and evaluate behavioral responses. Here we show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework to overcome these limitations. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt, providing a tractable solution to the highly unstable and novel two-level RL challenge. From a simple specification of an economy, we learn rational agent behaviors that adapt to learned planner policies and vice versa. We demonstrate the efficacy of the AI Economist on the problem of optimal taxation. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory. In complex, dynamic economies, the AI Economist substantially improves both utilitarian social welfare and the trade-off between equality and productivity over baselines. It does so despite emergent tax-gaming strategies, while accounting for agent interactions and behavioral change more accurately than economic theory. These results demonstrate for the first time that two-level, deep RL can be used for understanding and as a complement to theory for economic design, unlocking a new computational learning-based approach to understanding economic policy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. InvestESG: A multi-agent reinforcement learning benchmark for studying climate investment as a social dilemma

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    InvestESG is a MARL benchmark showing that ESG-conscious investors, not the disclosure mandate itself, drive corporate mitigation in long-run simulated markets.

  2. Beyond Human Intervention: Algorithmic Collusion through Multi-Agent Learning Strategies

    econ.TH 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pricing agent using past and live data can quickly reach collusive or adversarial profits and adapt when a competitor changes price.

Pith tools