Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Classification of $3 \operatorname{mod} 5$ arcs in $\operatorname{PG}(3,5)$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04871 v2 pith:SB6Y4OEC submitted 2021-08-10 math.CO cs.ITmath.IT

classification math.COcs.ITmath.IT
keywords operatornamearcscodesproofclassificationexamplesextendabilitygriesmer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The proof of the non-existence of Griesmer $[104, 4, 82]_5$-codes is just one of many examples where extendability results are used. In a series of papers Landjev and Rousseva have introduced the concept of $(t\operatorname{mod} q)$-arcs as a general framework for extendability results for codes and arcs. Here we complete the known partial classification of $(3 \operatorname{mod} 5)$-arcs in $\operatorname{PG}(3,5)$ and uncover two missing, rather exceptional, examples disproving a conjecture of Landjev and Rousseva. As also the original non-existence proof of Griesmer $[104, 4, 82]_5$-codes is affected, we present an extended proof to fill this gap.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools