Pith. Sign in

RECORD

From centre to centres: polycentric structures in individual mobility

Physics and Society · Submitted 18 Aug 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim With these notions, we propose a method to identify the centres in an individual's mobility and apply it to two large mobility datasets with socio-demographic features, showing that a polycentric description can capture features that a monocentric model is incapable of.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2108.08113 (version 1)
Pith IDSLAHIQP7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLaura Alessandretti, Renaud Lambiotte, Rohit Sahasrabuddhe. "From centre to centres: polycentric structures in individual mobility." arXiv:2108.08113 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/SLAHIQP7
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,347 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.62 · controlled comparison 0.22 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.87 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The availability of large-scale datasets collected via mobile phones has opened up opportunities to study human mobility at an individual level. The granular nature of these datasets calls for the design of summary statistics that can be used to describe succinctly mobility patterns. In this work, we show that the radius of gyration, a popular summary statistic to quantify the extent of an individual's whereabouts, suffers from a sensitivity to outliers, and is incapable of capturing mobility organised around multiple centres. We propose a natural generalisation of the radius of gyration to a polycentric setting, as well as a novel metric to assess the quality of its description. With these notions, we propose a method to identify the centres in an individual's mobility and apply it to two large mobility datasets with socio-demographic features, showing that a polycentric description can capture features that a monocentric model is incapable of.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The availability of large-scale datasets collected via mobile phones has opened up opportunities to study human mobility at an individual level. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.89
s1 The granular nature of these datasets calls for the design of summary statistics that can be used to describe succinctly mobility patterns. background 0.93 0.08 0.02 asserted 0.95
s2 In this work, we show that the radius of gyration, a popular summary statistic to quantify the extent of an individual's whereabouts, suffers from a sensitivity to outliers, and is incapable of capturing mobility organised around multiple centres. gap 0.71 0.76 0.21 asserted 1.00
s3 We propose a natural generalisation of the radius of gyration to a polycentric setting, as well as a novel metric to assess the quality of its description. contribution 0.87 0.95 0.10 asserted 0.99
s4 With these notions, we propose a method to identify the centres in an individual's mobility and apply it to two large mobility datasets with socio-demographic features, showing that a polycentric description can capture features that a monocentric model is incapable of. contribution 0.64 0.96 0.80 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The availability of large-scale datasets collected via mobile phones has opened up opportunities to study human mobility at an individual level. The granular nature of these datasets calls for the design of summary statistics that can be used to describe succinctly mobility patterns. In this work, we show that the radius of gyration, a popular summary statistic to quantify the extent of an individual's whereabouts, suffers from a sensitivity to outliers, and is incapable of capturing mobility organised around multiple centres. We propose a natural generalisation of the radius of gyration to a polycentric setting, as well as a novel metric to assess the quality of its description. With these notions, we propose a method to identify the centres in an individual's mobility and apply it to two large mobility datasets with socio-demographic features, showing that a polycentric description can capture features that a monocentric model is incapable of.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.