Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Restats: A Test Coverage Tool for RESTful APIs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.08209 v1 pith:VBUEXPSQ submitted 2021-08-18 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords testcoveragerestapiscodecompletenessmetricssource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Test coverage is a standard measure used to evaluate the completeness of a test suite. Coverage is typically computed on source code, by assessing the extent of source code entities (e.g., statements, data dependencies, control dependencies) that are exercised when running test cases. When considering REST APIs, an alternative perspective to assess test suite completeness is with respect to the service definition. This paper presents Restats, a test coverage tool for REST APIs that supports eight state-of-the-art test coverage metrics with a black-box perspective, i.e., only relying on the OpenAPI interface specification of the REST API under test. In fact, metrics are computed by only observing the HTTP requests and responses occurring at testing time, and no access to source/compiled code of the REST API is required. These coverage metrics come in handy for: (i) developers and test engineers working at development and maintenance tasks; (ii) stakeholders and customers who want to evaluate the completeness of acceptance tests; (iii) researches interested in comparing different automated test case generation strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combining TSL and LLM to Automate REST API Testing: A Comparative Study

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RestTSLLM combines Test Specification Language with few-shot prompting to generate REST API integration tests, and a comparative study finds Claude 3.5 Sonnet the best among eight LLMs.

Pith tools