Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Cosmic birefringence tomography and calibration-independence with reionization signals in the CMB

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.09287 v1 pith:DYELYSAT submitted 2021-08-20 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

classification astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords birefringencedifferentpolarizationreionizationanglesphysicsrecombinationsignals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The search for cosmic polarization rotation or birefringence in the CMB is well-motivated because it can provide powerful constraints on parity-violating new physics, such as axion-like particles. In this paper we point out that since the CMB polarization is produced at two very different redshifts - it is generated at both reionization and recombination - new parity-violating physics can generically rotate the polarization signals from these different sources by different amounts. We explore two implications of this. First, measurements of CMB birefringence are challenging because the effect is degenerate with a miscalibration of CMB polarization angles; however, by taking the difference of the reionization and recombination birefringence angles (measured from different CMB angular scales), we can obtain a cosmological signal that is immune to instrumental angle miscalibration. Second, we note that the combination with other methods for probing birefringence can give tomographic information, constraining the redshift origin of any physics producing birefringence. We forecast that the difference of the reionization and recombination birefringence angles can be competitively determined to within ~0.05 degrees for future CMB satellites such as LiteBIRD. Although much further work is needed, we argue that foreground mitigation for this measurement should be less challenging than for inflationary B-mode searches on similar scales due to larger signals and lower foregrounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 3-form dark energy and cosmic birefringence

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    3-form dark energy can explain cosmic birefringence with a dimension-4 photon coupling, yielding redshift profiles that can mimic or differ from axion dark energy, but the implied photon mass estimate is numerically shaky.

  2. Wading the String Bog: CMB Birefringence in the Swampland

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ultralight-axion explanations of cosmic birefringence sit in tension with Swampland bounds, while thin axionic domain walls predict exactly isotropic birefringence, so anisotropy measurements can discriminate the alte...

  3. Planck PR4 (NPIPE) map-space cosmic birefringence

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A map-space stacking analysis of Planck PR4 maps finds a CMB polarization rotation angle of about 0.46 to 0.48 degrees, dominated by instrument calibration uncertainty and consistent with no parity-violating cosmic bi...

  4. Cosmic Polarisation Rotation from CMB Data: a Review for GR110

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 unverdicted

    A review of CMB constraints on cosmic birefringence, reporting a possible 3 sigma hint for isotropic rotation and null anisotropic results.

Pith tools