Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Higher Vector Bundles

Category Theory · Submitted 2 Sep 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Concretely, we set an equivalence between representations up to homotopy and simplicial vector bundles endowed with a cleavage.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2109.01062 (version 4)
Pith IDWZSN3PWJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGiorgio Trentinaglia, Matias del Hoyo. "Higher Vector Bundles." arXiv:2109.01062 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/WZSN3PWJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,590 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We introduce higher analogs for cleavages in the context of (Kan) simplicial fibrations. We apply them to obtain geometric models for representations up to homotopy of (higher) Lie groupoids. Concretely, we set an equivalence between representations up to homotopy and simplicial vector bundles endowed with a cleavage. Our result is an incarnation of the Higher Grothendieck Correspondence, it can be seen as a relative Dold-Kan Theorem and extends earlier work of Gracia-Saz and Mehta on VB-groupoids.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We introduce higher analogs for cleavages in the context of (Kan) simplicial fibrations. contribution 1.00 0.93 0.07 asserted 1.00
s1 We apply them to obtain geometric models for representations up to homotopy of (higher) Lie groupoids. contribution 0.84 0.93 0.11 asserted 1.00
s2 Concretely, we set an equivalence between representations up to homotopy and simplicial vector bundles endowed with a cleavage. result 0.90 0.93 0.62 asserted 1.00
s3 Our result is an incarnation of the Higher Grothendieck Correspondence, it can be seen as a relative Dold-Kan Theorem and extends earlier work of Gracia-Saz and Mehta on VB-groupoids. interpretation 0.99 0.79 0.60 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We introduce higher analogs for cleavages in the context of (Kan) simplicial fibrations. We apply them to obtain geometric models for representations up to homotopy of (higher) Lie groupoids. Concretely, we set an equivalence between representations up to homotopy and simplicial vector bundles endowed with a cleavage. Our result is an incarnation of the Higher Grothendieck Correspondence, it can be seen as a relative Dold-Kan Theorem and extends earlier work of Gracia-Saz and Mehta on VB-groupoids.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 34 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 23 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • The key ingredient is the semi-direct product $G⋉_R E$ for general representations up to homotopy $GE=⊕_n≥0E_n$, recently developed [ref] , which produces a higher vector bundle $V→G$, a simplicial vector bundle over the nerve, generalizing VB-groupoids.

    On the cohomology of differentiable stacks · Introduction · 0.80

  • Most of what we are going to say in the next two sections is drawn out from [ref] .

    The Adjoint Representation of a Higher Lie Groupoid · The splitting construction for higher vector bundles · 0.80

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • It turns out that $$ admits a canonical homotopy inverse [ref] and, therefore, becomes an isomorphism within the homotopy category $^N_+(G)$ of $^N_+(G)$; in particular, down to the homotopy category, the functor $E ↦E$ becomes an essentially surjective one.

    The Adjoint Representation of a Higher Lie Groupoid · Further applications · 0.97

Cites it as background 3 papers
  • As to the remaining sections, [ref] and [ref] review a selection of topics from [ref] which constitute the indispensable conceptual background for the subject matter of section [ref].

    The Adjoint Representation of a Higher Lie Groupoid · Introduction · 1.00

  • See [ref] for further details.

    On the cohomology of differentiable stacks · Representations up to homotopy · 0.87

  • We conclude the appendix recalling that there is an equivalence between the category of RUTHs of a fixed Lie groupoid $G$, concentrated in non-positive degrees, and the category of higher VB groupoids on $G$, i.e. simplicial vector bundles over $G^(∙)$ (up to some technical aspects, see [ref] ).

    Shifted Contact Structures on Differentiable Stacks · Representations up to Homotopy · 0.91

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.