REVIEW 5 cited by
New Model for the Kreutz Sungrazer System: Contact-Binary Parent and Upgraded Classification of Discrete Fragment Populations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The structure of the Kreutz system of sungrazing comets is shown to be much more complex than formerly believed. Marsden's (1989) division into three subgroups (I, II, IIa) is now greatly expanded, as new evidence is being offered on nine populations of fragments -- I, Ia, II, IIa, III, Pre-I, Pe (side branch of I), IIIa, and IV, incorporating carefully screened data sets from a collection of gravitational orbits for 1500 SOHO/STEREO dwarf Kreutz comets. Tight correlations between the nominal perihelion latitude and nominal longitude of the ascending node are the result of ignored effects of an outgassing-driven acceleration on the orbital motion. The average width of a gap between adjacent populations in the corrected nodal longitude is near 9 deg; the overall range equals 66 deg. A self-consistent model postulates (i) an initial breakup, in general proximity of aphelion, of a contact-binary parent (progenitor) into its two lobes and the neck (originally linking the lobes), giving birth to, respectively, Population I (Lobe I; the main residual mass C/1843 D1), Population II (Lobe II; C/1882 R1), and Population Ia (the neck); followed by (ii) progressive fragmentation of the lobes (primarily Lobe II), mostly (but not exclusively) far from perihelion, giving successively rise to the other populations and clusters of naked-eye Kreutz sungrazers and their debris. The separation velocities were a few meters per second. Massive fragments of Populations Pre-I, IIIa, and IV are yet to be discovered. Relations among the products of cascading fragmentation are depicted in a pedigree chart. The age of the Kreutz system is estimated at two millennia and a mean orbital period of Lobe I and its main residual mass at ~740 yr. The status is reviewed of the possible historical Kreutz comets seen in AD 1106, AD 363, and 372 BC.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
The Great Comets of 1843 and 1882 at Their Previous Return to Perihelion in the Twelfth Century: One Spectacular, the Other Dull
The Chinese comet of 1138, identified as the previous return of the 1882 sungrazer, would have been invisible in daylight and only appeared about a month after perihelion, while the 1106 comet's daylight sighting matc...
-
Comet ATLAS (C/2024 S1) -- Second Ground-Based Discovery of a Kreutz Sungrazer in Thirteen Years
Comet ATLAS C/2024 S1 is identified as a Population II dwarf Kreutz sungrazer, possibly a fragment of the same parent as the great comets of 1882 and 1965.
-
Orbital-Period Determination As an Indispensable Tool to Study the Pedigree of a Sungrazing Comet
Sekanina uses observation-arc truncation and a radiation-pressure correction to assign previous perihelion dates of AD 363 (C/2026 A1), 1140 (Ikeya-Seki), and 1369 (Lovejoy), revising Kreutz sungrazer pedigrees.
-
New Insights into the Nature and Orbital Motion of Aristotle's Comet in 372 BC
Aristotle's comet of 372 BC likely reached perihelion on January 20, and its observed path and 60-degree tail fit the orbit predicted for the Kreutz sungrazer progenitor.
-
Orbital Motion and History of Sungrazing Comet C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
For comet C/2026 A1, the claimed AD-363 previous perihelion is produced by truncating astrometric data at a light-curve anomaly; other arc choices give dates from AD 276 to 357.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.