REVIEW
When is a Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Measure Monogamous?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A crucial issue in quantum communication tasks is characterizing how quantum resources can be quantified and distributed over many parties. Consequently, entanglement has been explored extensively. However, the genuine entanglement still lacks of studying. There are few genuine multipartite entanglement measures and whether it is monogamous is unknown so far. In this work, we explore the complete monogamy of genuine multipartite entanglement measure (GMEM) for which, at first, we investigate a framework for unified/complete GMEM according to the unified/complete multipartite entanglement measure proposed in [Phys. Rev. A 101, 032301 (2020)]. We find a way of inducing unified/complete GMEM from any given unified/complete multipartite entanglement measure.It is shown that any unified GMEM is completely monogamous, and any complete GMEM that induced by some given complete multipartite entanglement measure is tightly complete monogamous whenever the given complete multipartite entanglement measure is tightly complete monogamous. In addition, the previous GMEMs are checked under this framework. It turns out that the genuinely multipartite concurrence is not a good candidate as a GMEM.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.