Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploiting Reasoning Chains for Multi-hop Science Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.02905 v1 pith:TASHTHQK submitted 2021-09-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningchainchainsframeworkmulti-hopscienceansweringquestion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a novel Chain Guided Retriever-reader ({\tt CGR}) framework to model the reasoning chain for multi-hop Science Question Answering. Our framework is capable of performing explainable reasoning without the need of any corpus-specific annotations, such as the ground-truth reasoning chain, or human-annotated entity mentions. Specifically, we first generate reasoning chains from a semantic graph constructed by Abstract Meaning Representation of retrieved evidence facts. A \textit{Chain-aware loss}, concerning both local and global chain information, is also designed to enable the generated chains to serve as distant supervision signals for training the retriever, where reinforcement learning is also adopted to maximize the utility of the reasoning chains. Our framework allows the retriever to capture step-by-step clues of the entire reasoning process, which is not only shown to be effective on two challenging multi-hop Science QA tasks, namely OpenBookQA and ARC-Challenge, but also favors explainability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DocHop-QA: Towards Multi-Hop Reasoning over Multimodal Document Collections

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DocHop-QA introduces an 11,379-instance multimodal, multi-document, multi-hop QA benchmark from PubMed, and shows current models achieve only a best BLEU of 31.8.

Pith tools