Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Dual-Channel Framework for Sarcasm Recognition by Detecting Sentiment Conflict

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.03587 v2 pith:QK32QBMG submitted 2021-09-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords sarcasmconflictdual-channelsentimentframeworkrecognitionsentimentsdc-net
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sarcasm employs ambivalence, where one says something positive but actually means negative, and vice versa. The essence of sarcasm, which is also a sufficient and necessary condition, is the conflict between literal and implied sentiments expressed in one sentence. However, it is difficult to recognize such sentiment conflict because the sentiments are mixed or even implicit. As a result, the recognition of sophisticated and obscure sentiment brings in a great challenge to sarcasm detection. In this paper, we propose a Dual-Channel Framework by modeling both literal and implied sentiments separately. Based on this dual-channel framework, we design the Dual-Channel Network~(DC-Net) to recognize sentiment conflict. Experiments on political debates (i.e. IAC-V1 and IAC-V2) and Twitter datasets show that our proposed DC-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance on sarcasm recognition. Our code is released to support research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CAF-I: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Enhanced Irony Detection with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CAF-I, a multi-agent LLM framework with context, semantic, and rhetorical agents plus a refinement evaluator, reports state-of-the-art zero-shot irony detection, averaging 76.31 Macro-F1 across four benchmarks.

Pith tools