Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Discrete and Soft Prompting for Multilingual Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.03630 v1 pith:VGJSO6UM submitted 2021-09-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords promptingdiscretesoftenglishfinetuningmultilingualtrainingcrosslingual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It has been shown for English that discrete and soft prompting perform strongly in few-shot learning with pretrained language models (PLMs). In this paper, we show that discrete and soft prompting perform better than finetuning in multilingual cases: Crosslingual transfer and in-language training of multilingual natural language inference. For example, with 48 English training examples, finetuning obtains 33.74% accuracy in crosslingual transfer, barely surpassing the majority baseline (33.33%). In contrast, discrete and soft prompting outperform finetuning, achieving 36.43% and 38.79%. We also demonstrate good performance of prompting with training data in multiple languages other than English.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond English: The Impact of Prompt Translation Strategies across Languages and Tasks in Multilingual LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Selective pre-translation, translating only some prompt components into English, generally outperforms both full prompt translation and direct inference across tasks and languages, with the largest gains for low-resou...

Pith tools