REVIEW 1 cited by
Discrete and Soft Prompting for Multilingual Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
It has been shown for English that discrete and soft prompting perform strongly in few-shot learning with pretrained language models (PLMs). In this paper, we show that discrete and soft prompting perform better than finetuning in multilingual cases: Crosslingual transfer and in-language training of multilingual natural language inference. For example, with 48 English training examples, finetuning obtains 33.74% accuracy in crosslingual transfer, barely surpassing the majority baseline (33.33%). In contrast, discrete and soft prompting outperform finetuning, achieving 36.43% and 38.79%. We also demonstrate good performance of prompting with training data in multiple languages other than English.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond English: The Impact of Prompt Translation Strategies across Languages and Tasks in Multilingual LLMs
Selective pre-translation, translating only some prompt components into English, generally outperforms both full prompt translation and direct inference across tasks and languages, with the largest gains for low-resou...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.