Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Relating Graph Neural Networks to Structural Causal Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.04173 v3 pith:QSIFYQJN submitted 2021-09-09 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords causaleffectgraphinferenceinterestmodelmodelsnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Causality can be described in terms of a structural causal model (SCM) that carries information on the variables of interest and their mechanistic relations. For most processes of interest the underlying SCM will only be partially observable, thus causal inference tries leveraging the exposed. Graph neural networks (GNN) as universal approximators on structured input pose a viable candidate for causal learning, suggesting a tighter integration with SCM. To this effect we present a theoretical analysis from first principles that establishes a more general view on neural-causal models, revealing several novel connections between GNN and SCM. We establish a new model class for GNN-based causal inference that is necessary and sufficient for causal effect identification. Our empirical illustration on simulations and standard benchmarks validate our theoretical proofs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causal Analysis of ASR Errors for Children: Quantifying the Impact of Physiological, Cognitive, and Extrinsic Factors

    eess.AS 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For children's ASR, word error rates are driven most by utterance length and child age, then noise and pronunciation, and fine-tuning lowers age sensitivity but not length sensitivity.

Pith tools