Pith. Sign in

RECORD

An Accurate Comprehensive Approach to Substructure: II. Stripped Subhaloes

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 14 Sep 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This derivation clarifies the role of halo concentration in substructure and unravels the origin of some key features found in simulations including the dependence of substructure on halo mass.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2109.06490 (version 2)
Pith IDWKITUYGF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlberto Manrique, Eduard Salvador-Sol\'e, Ignacio Botella. "An Accurate Comprehensive Approach to Substructure: II. Stripped Subhaloes." arXiv:2109.06490 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/WKITUYGF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,327 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.95 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.42 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In Paper I we used the CUSP formalism to derive from first principles and no single free parameter the accurate abundance and radial distribution of both diffuse DM (dDM) and subhaloes accreted onto haloes and their progenitors at all previous times. Here we use those results as initial conditions for the monitoring of the evolution of subhaloes and dDM within the host haloes. Specifically, neglecting dynamical friction, we accurately calculate the effects of repetitive tidal stripping and heating on subhaloes as they orbit inside the host halo and infer the amount of dDM and subsubhaloes they release into the intra-halo medium. We then calculate the expected abundance and radial distribution of stripped subhaloes and dDM. This derivation clarifies the role of halo concentration in substructure and unravels the origin of some key features found in simulations including the dependence of substructure on halo mass. In addition, it unveils the specific effects of dynamical friction on substructure. The results derived here are for purely accreting haloes. In Paper III we complete the study by addressing the case of low-mass subhaloes, unaffected by dynamical friction, in ordinary haloes having suffered major mergers.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In Paper I we used the CUSP formalism to derive from first principles and no single free parameter the accurate abundance and radial distribution of both diffuse DM (dDM) and subhaloes accreted onto haloes and their progenitors at all previous times. background 0.98 0.59 0.07 asserted 1.00
s1 Here we use those results as initial conditions for the monitoring of the evolution of subhaloes and dDM within the host haloes. method 0.91 0.84 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 Specifically, neglecting dynamical friction, we accurately calculate the effects of repetitive tidal stripping and heating on subhaloes as they orbit inside the host halo and infer the amount of dDM and subsubhaloes they release into the intra-halo medium. method 0.89 0.95 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 We then calculate the expected abundance and radial distribution of stripped subhaloes and dDM. result 0.67 0.95 0.30 asserted 0.99
s4 This derivation clarifies the role of halo concentration in substructure and unravels the origin of some key features found in simulations including the dependence of substructure on halo mass. interpretation 0.99 0.91 0.36 asserted 1.00
s5 In addition, it unveils the specific effects of dynamical friction on substructure. result 0.40 0.80 0.09 asserted 1.00
s6 The results derived here are for purely accreting haloes. limitation 1.00 0.66 0.05 asserted 1.00
s7 In Paper III we complete the study by addressing the case of low-mass subhaloes, unaffected by dynamical friction, in ordinary haloes having suffered major mergers. future work 0.98 0.25 0.04 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In Paper I we used the CUSP formalism to derive from first principles and no single free parameter the accurate abundance and radial distribution of both diffuse DM (dDM) and subhaloes accreted onto haloes and their progenitors at all previous times. Here we use those results as initial conditions for the monitoring of the evolution of subhaloes and dDM within the host haloes. Specifically, neglecting dynamical friction, we accurately calculate the effects of repetitive tidal stripping and heating on subhaloes as they orbit inside the host halo and infer the amount of dDM and subsubhaloes they release into the intra-halo medium. We then calculate the expected abundance and radial distribution of stripped subhaloes and dDM. This derivation clarifies the role of halo concentration in substructure and unravels the origin of some key features found in simulations including the dependence of substructure on halo mass. In addition, it unveils the specific effects of dynamical friction on substructure. The results derived here are for purely accreting haloes. In Paper III we complete the study by addressing the case of low-mass subhaloes, unaffected by dynamical friction, in ordinary haloes having suffered major mergers.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers
  • High-resolution $N$-bdy simulations (e.g. [ref] ; [ref] , hereafter SWV; [ref] ) and, more recently, hydrodynamical simulations ( [ref] ; see also [ref] for the inclusion of gas using a semi-analytic treatment) have allowed to characterise their properties, while analytic models have been used to try to understand the origin of those properties (e.g. [ref] ).

    The Uchuu Simulations: Data Release 1 and Dark Matter Halo Concentrations · INTRODUCTION · 0.99

  • High-resolution $N$-bdy simulations (e.g. [ref] ; [ref] , hereafter SWV; [ref] ) and, more recently, hydrodynamical simulations ( [ref] ; see also [ref] for the inclusion of gas using a semi-analytic treatment) have allowed to characterise their properties, while analytic models have been used to try to understand the origin of those properties (e.g. [ref] ).

    Can cosmological simulations capture the diverse satellite populations of observed Milky Way analogues? · INTRODUCTION · 0.99

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.