Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The interplay of different metrics for the construction of constant dimension codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.07128 v2 pith:EONBJLC5 submitted 2021-09-15 cs.IT math.COmath.IT

classification cs.ITmath.COmath.IT
keywords codesconstantconstructionsdimensionboundscodewordsdifferentgeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A basic problem for constant dimension codes is to determine the maximum possible size $A_q(n,d;k)$ of a set of $k$-dimensional subspaces in $\mathbb{F}_q^n$, called codewords, such that the subspace distance satisfies $d_S(U,W):=2k-2\dim(U\cap W)\ge d$ for all pairs of different codewords $U$, $W$. Constant dimension codes have applications in e.g.\ random linear network coding, cryptography, and distributed storage. Bounds for $A_q(n,d;k)$ are the topic of many recent research papers. Providing a general framework we survey many of the latest constructions and show up the potential for further improvements. As examples we give improved constructions for the cases $A_q(10,4;5)$, $A_q(11,4;4)$, $A_q(12,6;6)$, and $A_q(15,4;4)$. We also derive general upper bounds for subcodes arising in those constructions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools