Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What Vision-Language Models `See' when they See Scenes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.07301 v1 pith:NEQBZ6ZN submitted 2021-09-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsclipdescriptionstheyalignimagesscene-levelterms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Images can be described in terms of the objects they contain, or in terms of the types of scene or place that they instantiate. In this paper we address to what extent pretrained Vision and Language models can learn to align descriptions of both types with images. We compare 3 state-of-the-art models, VisualBERT, LXMERT and CLIP. We find that (i) V&L models are susceptible to stylistic biases acquired during pretraining; (ii) only CLIP performs consistently well on both object- and scene-level descriptions. A follow-up ablation study shows that CLIP uses object-level information in the visual modality to align with scene-level textual descriptions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools