REVIEW 1 cited by
Taxonomy and Survey on Remote Human Input Systems for Driving Automation Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Corner cases for driving automation systems can often be detected by the system itself and subsequently resolved by remote humans. There exists a wide variety of technical approaches on how remote humans can resolve such issues. Over multiple domains, no common taxonomy on those approaches has developed yet, though. As the scaling of automated driving systems continues to increase, a uniform taxonomy is desirable to improve communication within the scientific community, but also beyond to policymakers and the general public. In this paper, we provide a survey on recent terminologies and propose a taxonomy for remote human input systems, classifying the different approaches based on their complexity.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Guiding, not Driving: Design and Evaluation of a Command-Based User Interface for Teleoperation of Autonomous Vehicles
A command-based tele-assistance interface for autonomous vehicles, built as a 175-screen prototype, was evaluated with 14 expert teleoperators who generally accepted the high-level command paradigm.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.