Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Julia for Biologists

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.09973 v1 pith:WCMGJODP submitted 2021-09-21 q-bio.QM

Julia for Biologists

classification q-bio.QM
keywords datacomputationaljuliaanalysingbiologicalcomputingmajorsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Increasing emphasis on data and quantitative methods in the biomedical sciences is making biological research more computational. Collecting, curating, processing, and analysing large genomic and imaging data sets poses major computational challenges, as does simulating larger and more realistic models in systems biology. Here we discuss how a relative newcomer among computer programming languages -- Julia -- is poised to meet the current and emerging demands in the computational biosciences, and beyond. Speed, flexibility, a thriving package ecosystem, and readability are major factors that make high-performance computing and data analysis available to an unprecedented degree to "gifted amateurs". We highlight how Julia's design is already enabling new ways of analysing biological data and systems, and we provide a, necessarily incomplete, list of resources that can facilitate the transition into the Julian way of computing.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.