Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Do I Get the Privacy I Need? Benchmarking Utility in Differential Privacy Libraries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.10789 v1 pith:3DDOYOXU submitted 2021-09-22 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords librariesprivacydifferentialguidancelibraryutilityanalyticsfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

An increasing number of open-source libraries promise to bring differential privacy to practice, even for non-experts. This paper studies five libraries that offer differentially private analytics: Google DP, SmartNoise, diffprivlib, diffpriv, and Chorus. We compare these libraries qualitatively (capabilities, features, and maturity) and quantitatively (utility and scalability) across four analytics queries (count, sum, mean, and variance) executed on synthetic and real-world datasets. We conclude that these libraries provide similar utility (except in some notable scenarios). However, there are significant differences in the features provided, and we find that no single library excels in all areas. Based on our results, we provide guidance for practitioners to help in choosing a suitable library, guidance for library designers to enhance their software, and guidance for researchers on open challenges in differential privacy tools for non-experts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools