Pith. sign in

REVIEW

How to find a good image-text embedding for remote sensing visual question answering?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.11848 v1 pith:PXQW2WNE submitted 2021-09-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modelfusionquestionremotesensingvisualansweringcomplexity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual question answering (VQA) has recently been introduced to remote sensing to make information extraction from overhead imagery more accessible to everyone. VQA considers a question (in natural language, therefore easy to formulate) about an image and aims at providing an answer through a model based on computer vision and natural language processing methods. As such, a VQA model needs to jointly consider visual and textual features, which is frequently done through a fusion step. In this work, we study three different fusion methodologies in the context of VQA for remote sensing and analyse the gains in accuracy with respect to the model complexity. Our findings indicate that more complex fusion mechanisms yield an improved performance, yet that seeking a trade-of between model complexity and performance is worthwhile in practice.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools