Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sorting through the noise: Testing robustness of information processing in pre-trained language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.12393 v1 pith:AH2Q3ERY submitted 2021-09-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsinformationcontextcontentdistractingpredictionsappearapplying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-trained LMs have shown impressive performance on downstream NLP tasks, but we have yet to establish a clear understanding of their sophistication when it comes to processing, retaining, and applying information presented in their input. In this paper we tackle a component of this question by examining robustness of models' ability to deploy relevant context information in the face of distracting content. We present models with cloze tasks requiring use of critical context information, and introduce distracting content to test how robustly the models retain and use that critical information for prediction. We also systematically manipulate the nature of these distractors, to shed light on dynamics of models' use of contextual cues. We find that although models appear in simple contexts to make predictions based on understanding and applying relevant facts from prior context, the presence of distracting but irrelevant content has clear impact in confusing model predictions. In particular, models appear particularly susceptible to factors of semantic similarity and word position. The findings are consistent with the conclusion that LM predictions are driven in large part by superficial contextual cues, rather than by robust representations of context meaning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Implicit Causality-biases in humans and LLMs as a tool for benchmarking LLM discourse capabilities

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Most tested LLMs fail to reproduce human implicit causality biases in coreference, coherence, and referring-expression form, even when they show partial coreference effects.

Pith tools