Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deciding Whether to Ask Clarifying Questions in Large-Scale Spoken Language Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.12451 v1 pith:GQDV67L6 submitted 2021-09-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords ambiguityambiguitiesclarifyingquestionsagentlarge-scaleuserasking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A large-scale conversational agent can suffer from understanding user utterances with various ambiguities such as ASR ambiguity, intent ambiguity, and hypothesis ambiguity. When ambiguities are detected, the agent should engage in a clarifying dialog to resolve the ambiguities before committing to actions. However, asking clarifying questions for all the ambiguity occurrences could lead to asking too many questions, essentially hampering the user experience. To trigger clarifying questions only when necessary for the user satisfaction, we propose a neural self-attentive model that leverages the hypotheses with ambiguities and contextual signals. We conduct extensive experiments on five common ambiguity types using real data from a large-scale commercial conversational agent and demonstrate significant improvement over a set of baseline approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools