REVIEW 1 cited by
On asymmetric dark matter constraints from the asteroseismology of a subgiant star
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The asteroseismic modelling of solar-like stars has proved to be valuable in constraining dark matter. In this work we study for the first time the influence of asymmetric dark matter (ADM) in the evolution of a subgiant star (KIC 8228742) by direct comparison with observational data. Both spectroscopic and seismic data are analysed with a new approach to the stellar calibration method, in which DM properties can also be considered as free inputs. In another phase of this study, a calibrated standard stellar model (without DM) is used as the benchmark for DM models. We find that the latter models consistently outperform the former for $10^{-40} \leq \sigma_\mathrm{SD} < 10^{-38}$ cm$^2$, hinting that the presence of ADM in stars of this type does not go against observations. Moreover, we show that stellar seismology allows us to suggest exclusion limits that complement the constraints set by direct detection experiments. Different seismic observables are proposed to study DM properties and $\Delta\Pi_\ell$ is found to be the most reliable, having the potential to build future DM exclusion diagrams. This new methodology can be a powerful tool in the analysis of the data coming from the next generation of asteroseismic missions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Asteroseismological constraints on--and hints of--dark matter interactions
Dark matter heat transport can erase convective cores in solar-mass stars, yielding asteroseismic constraints on dark matter-nucleon scattering and a 4 sigma hint of dark matter-electron scattering in KIC 8228742 that...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.