Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The JHU submission to VoxSRC-21: Track 3

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.13425 v1 pith:6JWNNC3S submitted 2021-09-28 eess.AS cs.LGcs.SD

classification eess.AScs.LGcs.SD
keywords challengelabelsmodelspeakerstageclusteringfinaliterations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This technical report describes Johns Hopkins University speaker recognition system submitted to Voxceleb Speaker Recognition Challenge 2021 Track 3: Self-supervised speaker verification (closed). Our overall training process is similar to the proposed one from the first place team in the last year's VoxSRC2020 challenge. The main difference is a recently proposed non-contrastive self-supervised method in computer vision (CV), distillation with no labels (DINO), is used to train our initial model, which outperformed the last year's contrastive learning based on momentum contrast (MoCo). Also, this requires only a few iterations in the iterative clustering stage, where pseudo labels for supervised embedding learning are updated based on the clusters of the embeddings generated from a model that is continually fine-tuned over iterations. In the final stage, Res2Net50 is trained on the final pseudo labels from the iterative clustering stage. This is our best submitted model to the challenge, showing 1.89, 6.50, and 6.89 in EER(%) in voxceleb1 test o, VoxSRC-21 validation, and test trials, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Clustering-based hard negative sampling for supervised contrastive speaker verification

    eess.AS 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Clustering speaker voiceprints and packing training batches with within-cluster negative pairs improves supervised contrastive speaker verification by up to 18% relative EER on VoxCeleb.

  2. Enhancing Self-Supervised Speaker Verification Using Similarity-Connected Graphs and GCN

    cs.SD 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A GCN-based similarity graph refinement step improves DINO pseudo-label clustering for self-supervised speaker verification, reporting 1.57% EER on VoxCeleb1-O.

Pith tools