Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Formulation and validation of a car-following model based on deep reinforcement learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.14268 v1 pith:5SXAWISD submitted 2021-09-29 cs.LG cs.ROeess.SP

classification cs.LGcs.ROeess.SP
keywords modelrewardfunctionsartificialcar-followingdatadeepdriving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose and validate a novel car following model based on deep reinforcement learning. Our model is trained to maximize externally given reward functions for the free and car-following regimes rather than reproducing existing follower trajectories. The parameters of these reward functions such as desired speed, time gap, or accelerations resemble that of traditional models such as the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) and allow for explicitly implementing different driving styles. Moreover, they partially lift the black-box nature of conventional neural network models. The model is trained on leading speed profiles governed by a truncated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process reflecting a realistic leader's kinematics. This allows for arbitrary driving situations and an infinite supply of training data. For various parameterizations of the reward functions, and for a wide variety of artificial and real leader data, the model turned out to be unconditionally string stable, comfortable, and crash-free. String stability has been tested with a platoon of five followers following an artificial and a real leading trajectory. A cross-comparison with the IDM calibrated to the goodness-of-fit of the relative gaps showed a higher reward compared to the traditional model and a better goodness-of-fit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Provably safe and human-like car-following behaviors: Part 1. Analysis of phases and dynamics in standard models

    eess.SY 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using phase-plane analysis, the paper shows that Newell, IDM, and Gipps car-following models each violate at least one stated safety or human-like principle in stationary-lead problems.

Pith tools