REVIEW 1 cited by
Formulation and validation of a car-following model based on deep reinforcement learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose and validate a novel car following model based on deep reinforcement learning. Our model is trained to maximize externally given reward functions for the free and car-following regimes rather than reproducing existing follower trajectories. The parameters of these reward functions such as desired speed, time gap, or accelerations resemble that of traditional models such as the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) and allow for explicitly implementing different driving styles. Moreover, they partially lift the black-box nature of conventional neural network models. The model is trained on leading speed profiles governed by a truncated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process reflecting a realistic leader's kinematics. This allows for arbitrary driving situations and an infinite supply of training data. For various parameterizations of the reward functions, and for a wide variety of artificial and real leader data, the model turned out to be unconditionally string stable, comfortable, and crash-free. String stability has been tested with a platoon of five followers following an artificial and a real leading trajectory. A cross-comparison with the IDM calibrated to the goodness-of-fit of the relative gaps showed a higher reward compared to the traditional model and a better goodness-of-fit.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Provably safe and human-like car-following behaviors: Part 1. Analysis of phases and dynamics in standard models
Using phase-plane analysis, the paper shows that Newell, IDM, and Gipps car-following models each violate at least one stated safety or human-like principle in stationary-lead problems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.