Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Proposed Conceptual Framework for a Representational Approach to Information Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.01529 v2 pith:ZQZU7GFM submitted 2021-10-04 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords retrievalmodelframeworkscoringconceptualinformationrepresentationalapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

This paper outlines a conceptual framework for understanding recent developments in information retrieval and natural language processing that attempts to integrate dense and sparse retrieval methods. I propose a representational approach that breaks the core text retrieval problem into a logical scoring model and a physical retrieval model. The scoring model is defined in terms of encoders, which map queries and documents into a representational space, and a comparison function that computes query-document scores. The physical retrieval model defines how a system produces the top-$k$ scoring documents from an arbitrarily large corpus with respect to a query. The scoring model can be further analyzed along two dimensions: dense vs. sparse representations and supervised (learned) vs. unsupervised approaches. I show that many recently proposed retrieval methods, including multi-stage ranking designs, can be seen as different parameterizations in this framework, and that a unified view suggests a number of open research questions, providing a roadmap for future work. As a bonus, this conceptual framework establishes connections to sentence similarity tasks in natural language processing and information access "technologies" prior to the dawn of computing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lighting the Way for BRIGHT: Reproducible Baselines with Anserini, Pyserini, and RankLLM

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BRIGHT's BM25 results come from query-side BM25 weighting rather than standard bag-of-words, and the paper shows this variant helps on the benchmark's long queries while shipping reproducible toolkits and a corpus audit.

Pith tools