Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MarkupLM: Pre-training of Text and Markup Language for Visually-rich Document Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.08518 v2 pith:VRYE4SQ5 submitted 2021-10-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords documentmarkuplmunderstandingdocumentsmarkuppre-trainedpre-trainingtext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal pre-training with text, layout, and image has made significant progress for Visually Rich Document Understanding (VRDU), especially the fixed-layout documents such as scanned document images. While, there are still a large number of digital documents where the layout information is not fixed and needs to be interactively and dynamically rendered for visualization, making existing layout-based pre-training approaches not easy to apply. In this paper, we propose MarkupLM for document understanding tasks with markup languages as the backbone, such as HTML/XML-based documents, where text and markup information is jointly pre-trained. Experiment results show that the pre-trained MarkupLM significantly outperforms the existing strong baseline models on several document understanding tasks. The pre-trained model and code will be publicly available at https://aka.ms/markuplm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. XPath Agent: An Efficient XPath Programming Agent Based on LLM for Web Crawler

    cs.IR 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage LLM pipeline generates XPath queries from natural language and sampled web pages, but the reported efficiency gains over the baseline are not backed by any comparative numbers.

Pith tools