Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Deep Learning to Estimate Permeability using Geophysical Data

Geophysics · Submitted 8 Oct 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This computational savings (O(105) - O(107)) makes the proposed DL-based inverse model attractive for subsurface imaging and real-time ERT monitoring applications due to fast and yet reasonably accurate estimations of the permeability field.

how it is stated · asserted 0.91 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2110.10077 (version 2)
Pith ID6YT4EYMS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationE. L. D. Cromwell, H. Wang, M. K. Mudunuru, X. Chen. "Deep Learning to Estimate Permeability using Geophysical Data." arXiv:2110.10077 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/6YT4EYMS
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 9,641 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.35 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.70 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is a popular geophysical method to estimate three-dimensional (3D) permeability fields from electrical potential difference measurements. Traditional inversion and data assimilation methods are used to ingest this ERT data into hydrogeophysical models to estimate permeability. Due to ill-posedness and the curse of dimensionality, existing inversion strategies provide poor estimates and low resolution of the 3D permeability field. Recent advances in deep learning provide us with powerful algorithms to overcome this challenge. This paper presents a deep learning (DL) framework to estimate the 3D subsurface permeability from time-lapse ERT data. To test the feasibility of the proposed framework, we train DL-enabled inverse models on simulation data. Subsurface process models based on hydrogeophysics are used to generate this synthetic data for deep learning analyses. Results show that proposed weak supervised learning can capture salient spatial features in the 3D permeability field. Quantitatively, the average mean squared error (in terms of the natural log) on the strongly labeled training, validation, and test datasets is less than 0.5. The R2-score (global metric) is greater than 0.75, and the percent error in each cell (local metric) is less than 10%. Finally, an added benefit in terms of computational cost is that the proposed DL-based inverse model is at least O(104) times faster than running a forward model. Note that traditional inversion may require multiple forward model simulations (e.g., in the order of 10 to 1000), which are very expensive. This computational savings (O(105) - O(107)) makes the proposed DL-based inverse model attractive for subsurface imaging and real-time ERT monitoring applications due to fast and yet reasonably accurate estimations of the permeability field.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is a popular geophysical method to estimate three-dimensional (3D) permeability fields from electrical potential difference measurements. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Traditional inversion and data assimilation methods are used to ingest this ERT data into hydrogeophysical models to estimate permeability. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Due to ill-posedness and the curse of dimensionality, existing inversion strategies provide poor estimates and low resolution of the 3D permeability field. gap 0.64 0.07 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 Recent advances in deep learning provide us with powerful algorithms to overcome this challenge. background 0.95 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.99
s4 This paper presents a deep learning (DL) framework to estimate the 3D subsurface permeability from time-lapse ERT data. contribution 1.00 0.86 0.11 asserted 0.99
s5 To test the feasibility of the proposed framework, we train DL-enabled inverse models on simulation data. method 0.95 0.93 0.03 asserted 0.99
s6 Subsurface process models based on hydrogeophysics are used to generate this synthetic data for deep learning analyses. method 1.00 0.67 0.02 asserted 1.00
s7 Results show that proposed weak supervised learning can capture salient spatial features in the 3D permeability field. result 0.99 0.93 0.28 asserted 1.00
s8 Quantitatively, the average mean squared error (in terms of the natural log) on the strongly labeled training, validation, and test datasets is less than 0.5. result 1.00 0.95 0.14 asserted 1.00
s9 The R2-score (global metric) is greater than 0.75, and the percent error in each cell (local metric) is less than 10%. result 1.00 0.94 0.13 asserted 1.00
s10 Finally, an added benefit in terms of computational cost is that the proposed DL-based inverse model is at least O(104) times faster than running a forward model. result 0.99 0.88 0.13 asserted 1.00
s11 Note that traditional inversion may require multiple forward model simulations (e.g., in the order of 10 to 1000), which are very expensive. background 0.59 0.10 0.03 hedged possibility 0.82
s12 This computational savings (O(105) - O(107)) makes the proposed DL-based inverse model attractive for subsurface imaging and real-time ERT monitoring applications due to fast and yet reasonably accurate estimations of the permeability field. interpretation 0.95 0.71 0.40 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is a popular geophysical method to estimate three-dimensional (3D) permeability fields from electrical potential difference measurements. Traditional inversion and data assimilation methods are used to ingest this ERT data into hydrogeophysical models to estimate permeability. Due to ill-posedness and the curse of dimensionality, existing inversion strategies provide poor estimates and low resolution of the 3D permeability field. Recent advances in deep learning provide us with powerful algorithms to overcome this challenge. This paper presents a deep learning (DL) framework to estimate the 3D subsurface permeability from time-lapse ERT data. To test the feasibility of the proposed framework, we train DL-enabled inverse models on simulation data. Subsurface process models based on hydrogeophysics are used to generate this synthetic data for deep learning analyses. Results show that proposed weak supervised learning can capture salient spatial features in the 3D permeability field. Quantitatively, the average mean squared error (in terms of the natural log) on the strongly labeled training, validation, and test datasets is less than 0.5. The R2-score (global metric) is greater than 0.75, and the percent error in each cell (local metric) is less than 10%. Finally, an added benefit in terms of computational cost is that the proposed DL-based inverse model is at least O(104) times faster than running a forward model. Note that traditional inversion may require multiple forward model simulations (e.g., in the order of 10 to 1000), which are very expensive. This computational savings (O(105) - O(107)) makes the proposed DL-based inverse model attractive for subsurface imaging and real-time ERT monitoring applications due to fast and yet reasonably accurate estimations of the permeability field.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 12 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.