Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analysis of core-mantle boundary seismic waves using full\-waveform modelling and adjoint methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.11068 v1 pith:WNWTW2HH submitted 2021-10-21 physics.geo-ph

Analysis of core-mantle boundary seismic waves using full\-waveform modelling and adjoint methods

classification physics.geo-ph
keywords topographyphasesadjointimagingmethodsseismicsensitivitytime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using spectral-element and adjoint methods, we investigate body waves interacting with the Earth's most dramatic interface, the core-mantle boundary (CMB). Intermediate-to-high frequency seismograms are computed incorporating topography models. We analyse the sensitivity of many seismic phases interacting with the interface. The study aims at showing effects of CMB structure on synthetics and highlights difficulties of imaging this region due to strong trade-off between velocity variations and topography. Synthetic waveforms computed at dominant periods of 6-18 seconds are used in order to observe time shifts due to topography and calculate the adjoint sensitivity kernel. We focus on diffracted, core reflected and refracted P and S waves. The sensitivity kernel depicts first Fresnel zones of these phases and others that may contribute to narrow time window, although unpredicted by ray theory. We perform comparisons between time shifts due to topography models made on full-waveform synthetics to ray theoretical predictions to assess methods usually deployed for imaging CMB. This shows that for most phases ray theory performs well enough with some accuracy loss. We propose that using relevant seismic phases simultaneously in full-waveform inversion may improve CMB topography imaging. However, it seems necessary to jointly invert for velocity variations due to D\" layer, which is so far poorly understood and presents a challenge when it comes to identifying its effects on traveltime data. In our further research, a FWI workflow is being developed and aims at addressing these issues.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.