Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Two-stage Pricing Strategy Considering Learning Effects and Word-of-Mouth

General Economics · Submitted 22 Oct 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Interestingly, our findings indicate that (1) the main reason for manufacturers to cut down prices for electronic products pertains to the learning effects; (2) even through both internal factors (e.g., the learning effects of manufacturers) and external factors (e.g., the price elasticity of customers) have impacts on product price, their influence on manufacturer's profit is widely divergent; (3) generally warranty weakens the influence of external advertising on the reliability estimate, because warranty price only partially reflects the actual reliability information of products; (4) and the optimal warranty price can increase the profits for the manufacturer by approximately 10%.

how it is stated · asserted 0.57 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2110.11581 (version 1)
Pith IDGKVJFS3E, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLai Wei, Wei Jiang, Yanrong Li. "A Two-stage Pricing Strategy Considering Learning Effects and Word-of-Mouth." arXiv:2110.11581 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/GKVJFS3E
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,094 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper proposes a two-stage pricing strategy for nondurable (such as typical electronics) products, where retail price is cut down at certain time points of the product lifecycle. We consider learning effect of electronic products that, with the accumulation of production, average production cost decreases over time as manufacturers get familiar with the production process. Moreover, word-of-mouth (WOM) of existing customers is used to analyze future demand, which is sensitive to the difference between the actual reliability and the perceived reliability of products. We theoretically prove the existence and uniqueness of the optimal switch time between the two stages and the optimal price in each stage. In addition, warranty as another important factor of electronic products is also considered, whose interaction with word-of-mouth as well as the corresponding influences on total profit are analyzed. Interestingly, our findings indicate that (1) the main reason for manufacturers to cut down prices for electronic products pertains to the learning effects; (2) even through both internal factors (e.g., the learning effects of manufacturers) and external factors (e.g., the price elasticity of customers) have impacts on product price, their influence on manufacturer's profit is widely divergent; (3) generally warranty weakens the influence of external advertising on the reliability estimate, because warranty price only partially reflects the actual reliability information of products; (4) and the optimal warranty price can increase the profits for the manufacturer by approximately 10%.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper proposes a two-stage pricing strategy for nondurable (such as typical electronics) products, where retail price is cut down at certain time points of the product lifecycle. contribution 0.98 0.82 0.06 asserted 1.00
s1 We consider learning effect of electronic products that, with the accumulation of production, average production cost decreases over time as manufacturers get familiar with the production process. background 0.59 0.12 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Moreover, word-of-mouth (WOM) of existing customers is used to analyze future demand, which is sensitive to the difference between the actual reliability and the perceived reliability of products. method 0.75 0.44 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 We theoretically prove the existence and uniqueness of the optimal switch time between the two stages and the optimal price in each stage. result 0.65 0.96 0.12 asserted 1.00
s4 In addition, warranty as another important factor of electronic products is also considered, whose interaction with word-of-mouth as well as the corresponding influences on total profit are analyzed. contribution 0.91 0.84 0.03 asserted 0.98
s5 Interestingly, our findings indicate that (1) the main reason for manufacturers to cut down prices for electronic products pertains to the learning effects; (2) even through both internal factors (e.g., the learning effects of manufacturers) and external factors (e.g., the price elasticity of customers) have impacts on product price, their influence on manufacturer's profit is widely divergent; (3) generally warranty weakens the influence of external advertising on the reliability estimate, because warranty price only partially reflects the actual reliability information of products; (4) and the optimal warranty price can increase the profits for the manufacturer by approximately 10%. result 0.85 0.95 0.88 asserted 0.57

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper proposes a two-stage pricing strategy for nondurable (such as typical electronics) products, where retail price is cut down at certain time points of the product lifecycle. We consider learning effect of electronic products that, with the accumulation of production, average production cost decreases over time as manufacturers get familiar with the production process. Moreover, word-of-mouth (WOM) of existing customers is used to analyze future demand, which is sensitive to the difference between the actual reliability and the perceived reliability of products. We theoretically prove the existence and uniqueness of the optimal switch time between the two stages and the optimal price in each stage. In addition, warranty as another important factor of electronic products is also considered, whose interaction with word-of-mouth as well as the corresponding influences on total profit are analyzed. Interestingly, our findings indicate that (1) the main reason for manufacturers to cut down prices for electronic products pertains to the learning effects; (2) even through both internal factors (e.g., the learning effects of manufacturers) and external factors (e.g., the price elasticity of customers) have impacts on product price, their influence on manufacturer's profit is widely divergent; (3) generally warranty weakens the influence of external advertising on the reliability estimate, because warranty price only partially reflects the actual reliability information of products; (4) and the optimal warranty price can increase the profits for the manufacturer by approximately 10%.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.