REVIEW 1 cited by
Generalized Multi-Task Learning from Substantially Unlabeled Multi-Source Medical Image Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning-based models, when trained in a fully-supervised manner, can be effective in performing complex image analysis tasks, although contingent upon the availability of large labeled datasets. Especially in the medical imaging domain, however, expert image annotation is expensive, time-consuming, and prone to variability. Semi-supervised learning from limited quantities of labeled data has shown promise as an alternative. Maximizing knowledge gains from copious unlabeled data benefits semi-supervised learning models. Moreover, learning multiple tasks within the same model further improves its generalizability. We propose MultiMix, a new multi-task learning model that jointly learns disease classification and anatomical segmentation in a semi-supervised manner, while preserving explainability through a novel saliency bridge between the two tasks. Our experiments with varying quantities of multi-source labeled data in the training sets confirm the effectiveness of MultiMix in the simultaneous classification of pneumonia and segmentation of the lungs in chest X-ray images. Moreover, both in-domain and cross-domain evaluations across these tasks further showcase the potential of our model to adapt to challenging generalization scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multi-Task Learning for Integrated Automated Contouring and Voxel-Based Dose Prediction in Radiotherapy
A shared multi-task network that predicts contours and dose maps together improves dose prediction relative to sequential contouring-plus-planning models, while a CT-only baseline sometimes does better.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.