Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Node-wise Localization of Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.14322 v1 pith:PVF7UAQB submitted 2021-10-27 cs.LG cs.SI

classification cs.LGcs.SI
keywords graphgloballocalmodelnodenodesdifferentgnns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) emerge as a powerful family of representation learning models on graphs. To derive node representations, they utilize a global model that recursively aggregates information from the neighboring nodes. However, different nodes reside at different parts of the graph in different local contexts, making their distributions vary across the graph. Ideally, how a node receives its neighborhood information should be a function of its local context, to diverge from the global GNN model shared by all nodes. To utilize node locality without overfitting, we propose a node-wise localization of GNNs by accounting for both global and local aspects of the graph. Globally, all nodes on the graph depend on an underlying global GNN to encode the general patterns across the graph; locally, each node is localized into a unique model as a function of the global model and its local context. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on four benchmark graphs, and consistently obtain promising performance surpassing the state-of-the-art GNNs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks Truly Effective for Node Classification? A Causal Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A large benchmark suggests tuned RGCN matches complex HGNNs and heterogeneous graphs help mainly via homophily and local-global label discrepancy, but the causal analysis is circular.

Pith tools