REVIEW 1 cited by
Collaborative Pure Exploration in Kernel Bandit
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we formulate a Collaborative Pure Exploration in Kernel Bandit problem (CoPE-KB), which provides a novel model for multi-agent multi-task decision making under limited communication and general reward functions, and is applicable to many online learning tasks, e.g., recommendation systems and network scheduling. We consider two settings of CoPE-KB, i.e., Fixed-Confidence (FC) and Fixed-Budget (FB), and design two optimal algorithms CoopKernelFC (for FC) and CoopKernelFB (for FB). Our algorithms are equipped with innovative and efficient kernelized estimators to simultaneously achieve computation and communication efficiency. Matching upper and lower bounds under both the statistical and communication metrics are established to demonstrate the optimality of our algorithms. The theoretical bounds successfully quantify the influences of task similarities on learning acceleration and only depend on the effective dimension of the kernelized feature space. Our analytical techniques, including data dimension decomposition, linear structured instance transformation and (communication) round-speedup induction, are novel and applicable to other bandit problems. Empirical evaluations are provided to validate our theoretical results and demonstrate the performance superiority of our algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multi-Agent Best Arm Identification in Stochastic Linear Bandits
New collaborative fixed-budget best-arm identification algorithms for stochastic linear bandits, with exponentially decaying error bounds and reduced communication on star and general networks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.