REVIEW 2 cited by
Kaniadakis holographic dark energy: observational constraints and global dynamics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We investigate Kaniadakis-holographic dark energy by confronting it with observations. We perform a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis using cosmic chronometers, supernovae type Ia, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations data. Concerning the Kaniadakis parameter, we find that it is constrained around zero, namely around the value in which Kaniadakis entropy recovers standard Bekenstein-Hawking one. Additionally, for the present matter density parameter $\Omega_m^{(0)}$, we obtain a value slightly smaller compared to $\Lambda$CDM scenario. Furthermore, we reconstruct the evolution of the Hubble, deceleration and jerk parameters extracting the deceleration-acceleration transition redshift as $z_T = 0.86^{+0.21}_{-0.14}$. Finally, performing a detailed local and global dynamical system analysis, we find that the past attractor of the Universe is the matter-dominated solution, while the late-time stable solution is the dark-energy-dominated one.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A comprehensive numerical study on four categories of holographic dark energy models
Seven holographic dark energy models are constrained with DESI BAO, Planck CMB, and PantheonPlus supernovae; LambdaCDM stays preferred, Ricci dark energy is ruled out, and event-horizon models show large data-set-depe...
-
Holographic dark energy in modified Kaniadakis cosmology
Kaniadakis holographic dark energy with Hubble-radius cutoff, placed in modified Kaniadakis cosmology, can mimic a cosmological constant and accelerate the universe without interaction, though the phantom-crossing cla...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.