Pith. Sign in

RECORD

LiMuSE: Lightweight Multi-modal Speaker Extraction

Audio and Speech Processing · Submitted 7 Nov 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The experiments on the MC_GRID dataset demonstrate that LiMuSE achieves on par or better performance with a much smaller number of parameters and less model complexity.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2111.04063 (version 3)
Pith ID2SSIY2KC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBo Xu, Jiaming Xu, Qinghua Liu, Yating Huang, Yunzhe Hao. "LiMuSE: Lightweight Multi-modal Speaker Extraction." arXiv:2111.04063 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/2SSIY2KC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,502 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.24 · human participants 0.41 · controlled comparison 0.34 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.73 · mentions code or data availability 0.99.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Multi-modal cues, including spatial information, facial expression and voiceprint, are introduced to the speech separation and speaker extraction tasks to serve as complementary information to achieve better performance. However, the introduction of these cues brings about an increasing number of parameters and model complexity, which makes it harder to deploy these models on resource-constrained devices. In this paper, we alleviate the aforementioned problem by proposing a Lightweight Multi-modal framework for Speaker Extraction (LiMuSE). We propose to use GC-equipped TCN, which incorporates Group Communication (GC) and Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) in the Context Codec module, the audio block and the fusion block. The experiments on the MC_GRID dataset demonstrate that LiMuSE achieves on par or better performance with a much smaller number of parameters and less model complexity. We further investigate the impacts of the quantization of LiMuSE. Our code and dataset are provided.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Multi-modal cues, including spatial information, facial expression and voiceprint, are introduced to the speech separation and speaker extraction tasks to serve as complementary information to achieve better performance. background 1.00 0.10 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 However, the introduction of these cues brings about an increasing number of parameters and model complexity, which makes it harder to deploy these models on resource-constrained devices. background 0.81 0.12 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 In this paper, we alleviate the aforementioned problem by proposing a Lightweight Multi-modal framework for Speaker Extraction (LiMuSE). contribution 0.99 0.84 0.10 asserted 0.95
s3 We propose to use GC-equipped TCN, which incorporates Group Communication (GC) and Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) in the Context Codec module, the audio block and the fusion block. method 0.96 0.90 0.04 asserted 0.93
s4 The experiments on the MC_GRID dataset demonstrate that LiMuSE achieves on par or better performance with a much smaller number of parameters and less model complexity. result 1.00 0.96 0.82 asserted 1.00
s5 We further investigate the impacts of the quantization of LiMuSE. contribution 0.91 0.90 0.02 unclear 0.61
s6 Our code and dataset are provided. contribution 0.96 0.70 0.02 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Multi-modal cues, including spatial information, facial expression and voiceprint, are introduced to the speech separation and speaker extraction tasks to serve as complementary information to achieve better performance. However, the introduction of these cues brings about an increasing number of parameters and model complexity, which makes it harder to deploy these models on resource-constrained devices. In this paper, we alleviate the aforementioned problem by proposing a Lightweight Multi-modal framework for Speaker Extraction (LiMuSE). We propose to use GC-equipped TCN, which incorporates Group Communication (GC) and Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) in the Context Codec module, the audio block and the fusion block. The experiments on the MC_GRID dataset demonstrate that LiMuSE achieves on par or better performance with a much smaller number of parameters and less model complexity. We further investigate the impacts of the quantization of LiMuSE. Our code and dataset are provided.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.