REVIEW 1 cited by
Generative Dynamic Patch Attack
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Adversarial patch attack is a family of attack algorithms that perturb a part of image to fool a deep neural network model. Existing patch attacks mostly consider injecting adversarial patches at input-agnostic locations: either a predefined location or a random location. This attack setup may be sufficient for attack but has considerable limitations when using it for adversarial training. Thus, robust models trained with existing patch attacks cannot effectively defend other adversarial attacks. In this paper, we first propose an end-to-end patch attack algorithm, Generative Dynamic Patch Attack (GDPA), which generates both patch pattern and patch location adversarially for each input image. We show that GDPA is a generic attack framework that can produce dynamic/static and visible/invisible patches with a few configuration changes. Secondly, GDPA can be readily integrated for adversarial training to improve model robustness to various adversarial attacks. Extensive experiments on VGGFace, Traffic Sign and ImageNet show that GDPA achieves higher attack success rates than state-of-the-art patch attacks, while adversarially trained model with GDPA demonstrates superior robustness to adversarial patch attacks than competing methods. Our source code can be found at https://github.com/lxuniverse/gdpa.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
IAP: Invisible Adversarial Patch Attack through Perceptibility-Aware Localization and Perturbation Optimization
A perceptibility-aware placement step plus a color-preserving perturbation update produces targeted adversarial patches that evade both human observers and six published patch defenses while keeping attack success rates high.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.