Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Bilinear pooling and metric learning network for early Alzheimer's disease identification with FDG-PET images

Image and Video Processing · Submitted 9 Nov 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experiments show that most metrics are improved after adding the bilinear pooling module and metric losses to the Baseline model respectively.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2111.04985 (version 1)
Pith IDHXAMIFTR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCaiying Yan, Chenlu Liu, Shuangqing Chen, Wenju Cui, Xi Jiang, Yilin Leng, Yunsong Peng, Zhuangzhi Yan. "Bilinear pooling and metric learning network for early Alzheimer's disease identification with FDG-PET images." arXiv:2111.04985 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/HXAMIFTR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,320 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.95 · controlled comparison 0.87 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

FDG-PET reveals altered brain metabolism in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Some biomarkers derived from FDG-PET by computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) technologies have been proved that they can accurately diagnosis normal control (NC), MCI, and AD. However, the studies of identification of early MCI (EMCI) and late MCI (LMCI) with FDG-PET images are still insufficient. Compared with studies based on fMRI and DTI images, the researches of the inter-region representation features in FDG-PET images are insufficient. Moreover, considering the variability in different individuals, some hard samples which are very similar with both two classes limit the classification performance. To tackle these problems, in this paper, we propose a novel bilinear pooling and metric learning network (BMNet), which can extract the inter-region representation features and distinguish hard samples by constructing embedding space. To validate the proposed method, we collect 998 FDG-PET images from ADNI. Following the common preprocessing steps, 90 features are extracted from each FDG-PET image according to the automatic anatomical landmark (AAL) template and then sent into the proposed network. Extensive 5-fold cross-validation experiments are performed for multiple two-class classifications. Experiments show that most metrics are improved after adding the bilinear pooling module and metric losses to the Baseline model respectively. Specifically, in the classification task between EMCI and LMCI, the specificity improves 6.38% after adding the triple metric loss, and the negative predictive value (NPV) improves 3.45% after using the bilinear pooling module.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 FDG-PET reveals altered brain metabolism in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Some biomarkers derived from FDG-PET by computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) technologies have been proved that they can accurately diagnosis normal control (NC), MCI, and AD. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 However, the studies of identification of early MCI (EMCI) and late MCI (LMCI) with FDG-PET images are still insufficient. gap 1.00 0.07 0.02 asserted 0.99
s3 Compared with studies based on fMRI and DTI images, the researches of the inter-region representation features in FDG-PET images are insufficient. gap 0.97 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 Moreover, considering the variability in different individuals, some hard samples which are very similar with both two classes limit the classification performance. gap 0.66 0.08 0.02 asserted 0.96
s5 To tackle these problems, in this paper, we propose a novel bilinear pooling and metric learning network (BMNet), which can extract the inter-region representation features and distinguish hard samples by constructing embedding space. contribution 0.89 0.85 0.23 asserted 0.98
s6 To validate the proposed method, we collect 998 FDG-PET images from ADNI. method 0.98 0.97 0.02 asserted 1.00
s7 Following the common preprocessing steps, 90 features are extracted from each FDG-PET image according to the automatic anatomical landmark (AAL) template and then sent into the proposed network. method 1.00 0.93 0.02 asserted 0.99
s8 Extensive 5-fold cross-validation experiments are performed for multiple two-class classifications. method 1.00 0.95 0.03 asserted 0.79
s9 Experiments show that most metrics are improved after adding the bilinear pooling module and metric losses to the Baseline model respectively. result 1.00 0.96 0.36 asserted 1.00
s10 Specifically, in the classification task between EMCI and LMCI, the specificity improves 6.38% after adding the triple metric loss, and the negative predictive value (NPV) improves 3.45% after using the bilinear pooling module. result 1.00 0.97 0.30 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.59.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

FDG-PET reveals altered brain metabolism in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Some biomarkers derived from FDG-PET by computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) technologies have been proved that they can accurately diagnosis normal control (NC), MCI, and AD. However, the studies of identification of early MCI (EMCI) and late MCI (LMCI) with FDG-PET images are still insufficient. Compared with studies based on fMRI and DTI images, the researches of the inter-region representation features in FDG-PET images are insufficient. Moreover, considering the variability in different individuals, some hard samples which are very similar with both two classes limit the classification performance. To tackle these problems, in this paper, we propose a novel bilinear pooling and metric learning network (BMNet), which can extract the inter-region representation features and distinguish hard samples by constructing embedding space. To validate the proposed method, we collect 998 FDG-PET images from ADNI. Following the common preprocessing steps, 90 features are extracted from each FDG-PET image according to the automatic anatomical landmark (AAL) template and then sent into the proposed network. Extensive 5-fold cross-validation experiments are performed for multiple two-class classifications. Experiments show that most metrics are improved after adding the bilinear pooling module and metric losses to the Baseline model respectively. Specifically, in the classification task between EMCI and LMCI, the specificity improves 6.38% after adding the triple metric loss, and the negative predictive value (NPV) improves 3.45% after using the bilinear pooling module.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.