Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The homogeneity scale and the growth rate of cosmic structures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.08541 v1 pith:G7ODPZ7S submitted 2021-11-16 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords textdatafunctiongrowthrateapproachcosmichomogeneity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We propose a novel approach to obtain the growth rate of cosmic structures, $f(z)$, from the evolution of the cosmic homogeneity scale, $R_{\text{H}}(z)$. Our methodology needs two ingredients in a specific functional form: $R_{\text{H}}(z)$ data and the matter two-point correlation function today, i.e., $\xi(r, z=0)$. We use a Gaussian Process approach to reconstruct the function $R_{\text{H}}$. In the absence of suitable observational information of the matter correlation function in the local Universe, $z \simeq 0$, we assume a fiducial cosmology to obtain $\xi(r, z=0)$. For this reason, our final result turns out to be a consistency test of the cosmological model assumed. Our results show a good agreement between: (i) the growth rate $f^{R_{\text{H}}}(z)$ obtained through our approach, (ii) the $f^{\Lambda\text{CDM}}(z)$ expected in the fiducial model, and (iii) the best-fit $f(z)$ from data compiled in the literature. Moreover, using this data compilation, we perform a Gaussian Process to reconstruct the growth rate function $f^{\text{data}}(z)$ and compare it with the function $f^{R_{\text{H}}}(z)$ finding a concordance of $< \!2 \,\sigma$, a good result considering the few data available for both reconstruction processes. With more accurate $R_{\text{H}}(z)$ data, from forthcoming surveys, the homogeneity scale function might be better determined and would have the potential to discriminate between $\Lambda$CDM and alternative scenarios as a new cosmological observable.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing Scale-Dependent Suppression of Structure Growth in the Linear Regime

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A combined fit of galaxy-growth, supernova, and CMB data finds at most a weak 2.2σ hint for scale-dependent suppression of structure growth, with an inconclusive Bayes factor.

  2. A cosmology weakly dependent measurement of 2D Baryon Acoustic Oscillations scale from the Southern Photometric Local Universe Survey

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A measurement of the baryon acoustic oscillation angular scale at z_eff = 0.075 from the S-PLUS survey, giving theta_BAO = 21.81 +/- 0.85 degrees.

  3. Revisiting the temperature evolution law of the CMB with gaussian processes

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Gaussian Process reconstruction of CMB temperature data yields mild (~2 sigma) hints of deviation from T(z)=T0(1+z) at low redshift and a slight tension with COBE/FIRAS.

  4. Is $\omega_0 \omega_a$CDM a good model for the clumpy Universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Against a Gaussian-process reconstruction of 15 sigma8(z) measurements, the DESI w0waCDM model fits slightly better than LambdaCDM, but the difference is tiny and the comparison metric is biased.

Pith tools