Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.09525 v1 pith:QD7CJXSC submitted 2021-11-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords detectioninconsistencymodelsworkdatasetssummaccalleddocument
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the summarization domain, a key requirement for summaries is to be factually consistent with the input document. Previous work has found that natural language inference (NLI) models do not perform competitively when applied to inconsistency detection. In this work, we revisit the use of NLI for inconsistency detection, finding that past work suffered from a mismatch in input granularity between NLI datasets (sentence-level), and inconsistency detection (document level). We provide a highly effective and light-weight method called SummaCConv that enables NLI models to be successfully used for this task by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences. On our newly introduced benchmark called SummaC (Summary Consistency) consisting of six large inconsistency detection datasets, SummaCConv obtains state-of-the-art results with a balanced accuracy of 74.4%, a 5% point improvement compared to prior work. We make the models and datasets available: https://github.com/tingofurro/summac

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ProvenanceGuard: Source-Aware Factuality Verification for MCP-Based LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ProvenanceGuard detects when a claim in an MCP-based agent answer is supported somewhere but attributed to the wrong source, with block F1 0.802 and perfect detection on 50 controlled swaps.

  2. RH-RAG: Trustworthy Long-Form Generation for Privacy-Constrained Settings

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent RAG framework that adds planning, bounded memory, and NLI-based revision to local 7-8B models, reported to improve faithfulness and coherence in long-form generation.

Pith tools