Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Modeling Annotator Preference and Stochastic Annotation Error for Medical Image Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.13410 v3 pith:2UYA6OQD submitted 2021-11-26 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords segmentationmedicalstochasticannotationannotatorerrorimagebiases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Manual annotation of medical images is highly subjective, leading to inevitable and huge annotation biases. Deep learning models may surpass human performance on a variety of tasks, but they may also mimic or amplify these biases. Although we can have multiple annotators and fuse their annotations to reduce stochastic errors, we cannot use this strategy to handle the bias caused by annotators' preferences. In this paper, we highlight the issue of annotator-related biases on medical image segmentation tasks, and propose a Preference-involved Annotation Distribution Learning (PADL) framework to address it from the perspective of disentangling an annotator's preference from stochastic errors using distribution learning so as to produce not only a meta segmentation but also the segmentation possibly made by each annotator. Under this framework, a stochastic error modeling (SEM) module estimates the meta segmentation map and average stochastic error map, and a series of human preference modeling (HPM) modules estimate each annotator's segmentation and the corresponding stochastic error. We evaluated our PADL framework on two medical image benchmarks with different imaging modalities, which have been annotated by multiple medical professionals, and achieved promising performance on all five medical image segmentation tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoupled Single-Mask Annotation Noise Detection via Cross-Sectional Patch Self-Consistency

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cross-sectional patches with near-identical intensity but inconsistent masks are flagged as annotation noise, revealing systematic orientation-dependent bias in single-rater vascular CT labels.

Pith tools