Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The weighted Hilbert--Schmidt numerical radius

Functional Analysis · Submitted 28 Nov 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Furthermore, we give a refinement of the triangle inequality for the Hilbert--Schmidt norm as follows: \begin{align*} {\|A+B\|}_{2} \leq \sqrt{2w_{_{({\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2},\nu)}}^2\left(\begin{bmatrix} 0 & A \\ B^* & 0 \end{bmatrix}\right) - (1-2\nu)^2{\|A-B\|}_{2}^2} \leq {\|A\|}_{2} + {\|B\|}_{2}.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2111.14222 (version 1)
Pith IDEXSYE5E5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAli Zamani. "The weighted Hilbert--Schmidt numerical radius." arXiv:2111.14222 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/EXSYE5E5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,965 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.90 · compares with prior results 0.86 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Let $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})$ be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and let $N(\cdot)$ be a norm on $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})$. For every $0\leq \nu \leq 1$, we introduce the $w_{_{(N,\nu)}}(A)$ as an extension of the classical numerical radius by \begin{align*} w_{_{(N,\nu)}}(A):= \displaystyle{\sup_{\theta \in \mathbb{R}}} N\left(\nu e^{i\theta}A + (1-\nu)e^{-i\theta}A^*\right) \end{align*} and investigate basic properties of this notion and prove inequalities involving it. In particular, when $N(\cdot)$ is the Hilbert--Schmidt norm ${\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2}$, we present several the weighted Hilbert--Schmidt numerical radius inequalities for operator matrices. Furthermore, we give a refinement of the triangle inequality for the Hilbert--Schmidt norm as follows: \begin{align*} {\|A+B\|}_{2} \leq \sqrt{2w_{_{({\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2},\nu)}}^2\left(\begin{bmatrix} 0 & A \\ B^* & 0 \end{bmatrix}\right) - (1-2\nu)^2{\|A-B\|}_{2}^2} \leq {\|A\|}_{2} + {\|B\|}_{2}. \end{align*} Our results extend some theorems due to F.~Kittaneh et al. (2019).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Let $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})$ be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and let $N(\cdot)$ be a norm on $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})$. background 1.00 0.09 0.02 asserted 0.76
s1 For every $0\leq \nu \leq 1$, we introduce the $w_{_{(N,\nu)}}(A)$ as an extension of the classical numerical radius by \begin{align*} w_{_{(N,\nu)}}(A):= \displaystyle{\sup_{\theta \in \mathbb{R}}} N\left(\nu e^{i\theta}A + (1-\nu)e^{-i\theta}A^*\right) \end{align*} and investigate basic properties of this notion and prove inequalities involving it. contribution 0.99 0.95 0.20 asserted 1.00
s2 In particular, when $N(\cdot)$ is the Hilbert--Schmidt norm ${\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2}$, we present several the weighted Hilbert--Schmidt numerical radius inequalities for operator matrices. contribution 0.83 0.94 0.19 asserted 1.00
s3 Furthermore, we give a refinement of the triangle inequality for the Hilbert--Schmidt norm as follows: \begin{align*} {\|A+B\|}_{2} \leq \sqrt{2w_{_{({\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2},\nu)}}^2\left(\begin{bmatrix} 0 & A \\ B^* & 0 \end{bmatrix}\right) - (1-2\nu)^2{\|A-B\|}_{2}^2} \leq {\|A\|}_{2} + {\|B\|}_{2}. result 0.94 0.95 0.31 asserted 1.00
s4 \end{align*} Our results extend some theorems due to F.~Kittaneh et al. (2019). interpretation 0.52 0.48 0.11 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Let $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})$ be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and let $N(\cdot)$ be a norm on $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})$. For every $0\leq \nu \leq 1$, we introduce the $w_{_{(N,\nu)}}(A)$ as an extension of the classical numerical radius by \begin{align*} w_{_{(N,\nu)}}(A):= \displaystyle{\sup_{\theta \in \mathbb{R}}} N\left(\nu e^{i\theta}A + (1-\nu)e^{-i\theta}A^*\right) \end{align*} and investigate basic properties of this notion and prove inequalities involving it. In particular, when $N(\cdot)$ is the Hilbert--Schmidt norm ${\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2}$, we present several the weighted Hilbert--Schmidt numerical radius inequalities for operator matrices. Furthermore, we give a refinement of the triangle inequality for the Hilbert--Schmidt norm as follows: \begin{align*} {\|A+B\|}_{2} \leq \sqrt{2w_{_{({\|\!\cdot\!\|}_{2},\nu)}}^2\left(\begin{bmatrix} 0 & A \\ B^* & 0 \end{bmatrix}\right) - (1-2\nu)^2{\|A-B\|}_{2}^2} \leq {\|A\|}_{2} + {\|B\|}_{2}. \end{align*} Our results extend some theorems due to F.~Kittaneh et al. (2019).

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.