Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Automated Detection of Patients in Hospital Video Recordings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.14270 v1 pith:B2WF5GYH submitted 2021-11-28 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords videopatientpatientsdetectionautomateddatasethospitalclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a clinical setting, epilepsy patients are monitored via video electroencephalogram (EEG) tests. A video EEG records what the patient experiences on videotape while an EEG device records their brainwaves. Currently, there are no existing automated methods for tracking the patient's location during a seizure, and video recordings of hospital patients are substantially different from publicly available video benchmark datasets. For example, the camera angle can be unusual, and patients can be partially covered with bedding sheets and electrode sets. Being able to track a patient in real-time with video EEG would be a promising innovation towards improving the quality of healthcare. Specifically, an automated patient detection system could supplement clinical oversight and reduce the resource-intensive efforts of nurses and doctors who need to continuously monitor patients. We evaluate an ImageNet pre-trained Mask R-CNN, a standard deep learning model for object detection, on the task of patient detection using our own curated dataset of 45 videos of hospital patients. The dataset was aggregated and curated for this work. We show that without fine-tuning, ImageNet pre-trained Mask R-CNN models perform poorly on such data. By fine-tuning the models with a subset of our dataset, we observe a substantial improvement in patient detection performance, with a mean average precision of 0.64. We show that the results vary substantially depending on the video clip.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools