RECORD
Creativity in social networks is enhanced by 'Goldilocks' dispersal of ideators' visibility
Social and Information Networks · Submitted 6 Dec 2021
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Networks that partially disperse the ideators' visibility using this external signal show reduced idea-redundancy and elevated creativity.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Recent works suggest that striking a balance between maximizing idea stimulation and minimizing idea redundancy can elevate creativity in self-organizing social networks. We explore whether dispersing the visibility of idea generators can help achieve such a trade-off. We employ popularity signals (follower counts) of participants as an external source of variation in network structures, which we control across four randomized study conditions. We observe that popularity signals influence inspiration-seeking ties, partly by biasing people's perception of their peers' creativity. Networks that partially disperse the ideators' visibility using this external signal show reduced idea-redundancy and elevated creativity. However, extreme dispersal leads to inferior creativity by narrowing the range of idea stimulation. Our work holds future-of-work implications for elevating creativity.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Recent works suggest that striking a balance between maximizing idea stimulation and minimizing idea redundancy can elevate creativity in self-organizing social networks. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.06 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
| s1 | We explore whether dispersing the visibility of idea generators can help achieve such a trade-off. | contribution 0.80 | 0.30 | 0.03 | hedged possibility 0.47 |
| s2 | We employ popularity signals (follower counts) of participants as an external source of variation in network structures, which we control across four randomized study conditions. | method 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.02 | asserted 0.97 |
| s3 | We observe that popularity signals influence inspiration-seeking ties, partly by biasing people's perception of their peers' creativity. | result 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.04 | asserted 0.94 |
| s4 | Networks that partially disperse the ideators' visibility using this external signal show reduced idea-redundancy and elevated creativity. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.78 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | However, extreme dispersal leads to inferior creativity by narrowing the range of idea stimulation. | result 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.15 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | Our work holds future-of-work implications for elevating creativity. | interpretation 0.78 | 0.11 | 0.03 | asserted 0.55 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Recent works suggest that striking a balance between maximizing idea stimulation and minimizing idea redundancy can elevate creativity in self-organizing social networks. We explore whether dispersing the visibility of idea generators can help achieve such a trade-off. We employ popularity signals (follower counts) of participants as an external source of variation in network structures, which we control across four randomized study conditions. We observe that popularity signals influence inspiration-seeking ties, partly by biasing people's perception of their peers' creativity. Networks that partially disperse the ideators' visibility using this external signal show reduced idea-redundancy and elevated creativity. However, extreme dispersal leads to inferior creativity by narrowing the range of idea stimulation. Our work holds future-of-work implications for elevating creativity.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.