Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Value of Robust Assortment Optimization Under Ranking-based Choice Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.05010 v4 pith:WCUTAT5Q submitted 2021-12-09 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords optimizationproblemsrobustassortmentassortmentschoicemodelsranking-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a class of robust assortment optimization problems that was proposed by Farias, Jagabathula, and Shah (2013). The goal in these problems is to find an assortment that maximizes a firm's worst-case expected revenue under all ranking-based choice models that are consistent with the historical sales data generated by the firm's past assortments. We establish for various settings that these robust optimization problems can either be solved in polynomial-time or can be reformulated as compact mixed-integer optimization problems. To establish our results, we prove that optimal assortments for these robust optimization problems have a simple structure that is closely related to the structure of revenue-ordered assortments. We use our results to show how robust optimization can be used to overcome the risks of estimate-then-optimize and the need for experimentation with ranking-based choice models in the overparameterized regime.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools