Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DronePose: The identification, segmentation, and orientation detection of drones via neural networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.05488 v1 pith:BP6KYZLY submitted 2021-12-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords dronesaccuratelycharacterisedronebodydatadetectionflight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The growing ubiquity of drones has raised concerns over the ability of traditional air-space monitoring technologies to accurately characterise such vehicles. Here, we present a CNN using a decision tree and ensemble structure to fully characterise drones in flight. Our system determines the drone type, orientation (in terms of pitch, roll, and yaw), and performs segmentation to classify different body parts (engines, body, and camera). We also provide a computer model for the rapid generation of large quantities of accurately labelled photo-realistic training data and demonstrate that this data is of sufficient fidelity to allow the system to accurately characterise real drones in flight. Our network will provide a valuable tool in the image processing chain where it may build upon existing drone detection technologies to provide complete drone characterisation over wide areas.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Drone Detection using Deep Neural Networks Trained on Pure Synthetic Data

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Faster R-CNN trained on synthetic drone images reached 97.0% AP50 on the real MAV-Vid set, close to 97.8% for a real-data model, but only 49.8% and 67.8% on two other real datasets.

Pith tools