Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Productivity through Corporate Hackathons: A Multiple Case Study of Two Large-scale Agile Organizations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.05528 v1 pith:PRWE4FQI submitted 2021-12-10 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords hackathonsworkbecausefoundimprovemanyproductivityagile
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Software development companies organize hackathons to encourage innovation. Despite many benefits of hackathons, in large-scale agile organizations where many teams work together, stopping the ongoing work results in a significant decrease in the immediate output. Motivated by the need to understand whether and how to run hackathons, we investigated how the practice affects productivity on the individual and organizational levels. By mapping the benefits and challenges to an established productivity framework, we found that hackathons improve developers' satisfaction and well-being, strengthen the company culture, improve performance (as many ideas are tested), increase activity (as the ideas are developed quickly), and improve communication and collaboration (because the social network is strengthened). Addressing managerial concerns, we found that hackathons also increase efficiency and flow because people learn to complete work and make progress quickly, and they build new competence. Finally, with respect to virtual hackathons we found that developers work more in isolation because tasks are split between team members resulting in less collaboration. This means that some important, expected hackathon values in virtual contexts require extra effort and cannot be taken for granted.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 39 studies shows LLM coding assistants generally improve perceived speed and reduce online search, while code quality outcomes remain inconsistent and long-term team effects are understudied.

Pith tools