Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The resilience of the Etherington-Hubble relation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.05701 v2 pith:VFQYK6CZ submitted 2021-12-10 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords epsilonbuildcheckconsistencyconstraintscosmicdataetherington
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Etherington reciprocity theorem, or distance duality relation (DDR), relates the mutual scaling of cosmic distances in any metric theory of gravity where photons are massless and propagate on null geodesics. In this paper, we make use of the DDR to build a consistency check based on its degeneracy with the Hubble constant, $H_0$. We parameterise the DDR using the form $\eta(z) = 1+ \epsilon z$, thus only allowing small deviations from its standard value. We use a combination of late time observational data to provide the first joint constraints on the Hubble parameter and $\epsilon$ with percentage accuracy: $H_0 = 68.6 \pm 2.5$ kms$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$ and $\epsilon = 0.001^{+0.023}_{-0.026}$. We build our consistency check using these constraints and compare them with the results obtained in extended cosmological models using cosmic microwave background data. We find that extensions to $\Lambda$CDM involving massive neutrinos and/or additional dark radiation are in perfect agreement with the DDR, while models with non-zero spatial curvature show a preference for DDR violation, i.e., $\epsilon \ne 0 $ at the level of $\sim 1.5 \sigma$. Most importantly, we find a mild 2$\sigma$ discrepancy between the validity of the DDR and the latest publicly available Cepheid-calibrated SNIa constraint on $H_0$. We discuss the potential consequences of this for both the Etherington reciprocity theorem and the $H_0$ tension.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hubble tension: the shape wall

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Late-time modifications to the expansion history can raise H0 by at most about 2% (conservative) to 3.7% (permissive) if the CMB acoustic scale is fixed.

  2. The cosmic tetrarchy: four estimators breaking the assumption degeneracy in cosmological distance tensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The cosmic tetrarchy decomposes BAO-based measurements into four channels that isolate distinct assumptions to test whether the dimensionless sound-horizon ratio remains a single redshift-independent number.

  3. Implications for dark energy of cosmic transparency in light of DESI data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No deviation found from the distance duality relation in combined DESI, CMB, and supernova data, ruling out dimming as an explanation of the Hubble tension.

  4. A Joint Analysis of Strong Lensing and Type Ia Supernovae to Determine the Hubble Constant

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A model-independent combination of strong lensing and supernova data gives H0 = 70.55 ± 7.44 km/s/Mpc, consistent with both Planck and SH0ES within 1sigma.

Pith tools