Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.06409 v3 pith:LTOPQUWJ submitted 2021-12-13 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords datalearningmachinecollectiondata-centricdeepengineeringeven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data-centric AI is at the center of a fundamental shift in software engineering where machine learning becomes the new software, powered by big data and computing infrastructure. Here software engineering needs to be re-thought where data becomes a first-class citizen on par with code. One striking observation is that a significant portion of the machine learning process is spent on data preparation. Without good data, even the best machine learning algorithms cannot perform well. As a result, data-centric AI practices are now becoming mainstream. Unfortunately, many datasets in the real world are small, dirty, biased, and even poisoned. In this survey, we study the research landscape for data collection and data quality primarily for deep learning applications. Data collection is important because there is lesser need for feature engineering for recent deep learning approaches, but instead more need for large amounts of data. For data quality, we study data validation, cleaning, and integration techniques. Even if the data cannot be fully cleaned, we can still cope with imperfect data during model training using robust model training techniques. In addition, while bias and fairness have been less studied in traditional data management research, these issues become essential topics in modern machine learning applications. We thus study fairness measures and unfairness mitigation techniques that can be applied before, during, or after model training. We believe that the data management community is well poised to solve these problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The NaijaVoices Dataset: Cultivating Large-Scale, High-Quality, Culturally-Rich Speech Data for African Languages

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    NaijaVoices is a 1,838-hour, 5,455-speaker speech-text corpus for Igbo, Hausa, and Yoruba whose use in fine-tuning cuts Word Error Rates by 42-76% relative to unadapted baselines.

  2. A Comparative Analysis of Influence Signals for Data Debugging

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A benchmark shows Self-Influence finds mislabeled training samples, while all tested influence signals fail to detect clustered anomalies and outliers under cumulative TracIn scoring.

Pith tools