Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anomaly Detection in Particle Accelerators using Autoencoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.07793 v1 pith:EFJ6P42N submitted 2021-12-14 physics.acc-ph

classification physics.acc-ph
keywords anomalydatadetectionlearningacceleratorsanalysisautoencodersduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The application of machine learning techniques for anomaly detection in particle accelerators has gained popularity in recent years. These efforts have ranged from the analysis of quenches in radio frequency cavities and superconducting magnets to anomalous beam position monitors, and even losses in rings. Using machine learning for anomaly detection can be challenging owing to the inherent imbalance in the amount of data collected during normal operations as compared to during faults. Additionally, the data are not always labeled and therefore supervised learning is not possible. Autoencoders, neural networks that form a compressed representation and reconstruction of the input data, are a useful tool for such situations. Here we explore the use of autoencoder reconstruction analysis for the prediction of magnet faults in the Advanced Photon Source (APS) storage ring at Argonne National Laboratory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coincident Learning for Beam-based RF Station Fault Identification Using Phase Information at the SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source

    physics.acc-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using RF phase data with the CoAD framework detects about three times as many RF station anomalies at LCLS as using amplitude data, and clusters them by fault type.

Pith tools